Natural spoken Japanese · 10 minutes · 0003

見直す

A proposal can need another look without needing to be thrown away.

1 · Natural input · about 3 minutes

ウェブサイトの企画会議

Read once for the decision, then aloud as both speakers. Which parts of the proposal survive?

Notice: means reach a final decision, not merely discuss. here means take the question back to one’s team for consideration. make the proposal tentative without making it vague.

Recall: Before reading on, say in Japanese what B will change—and what B will keep.

2 · Lexical neighborhood + retrieval · about 4 minutes

Another look, or another start?

見直す places the camera on an existing plan or draft. You inspect it again to see what should change; the word does not say that the whole plan is wrong. The other verbs name different operations on that plan.

is literally “look again / look to improve.” The pattern can also attach to the particular work you repeat: . A second pass need not mean starting from zero.

Expression What changes? Natural package
Re-examine a draft, structure, or approach; revise if needed.
Reorder or clarify material already gathered.
Work an idea or plan through again, often more deeply.
Reduce several possibilities or pieces of information by a criterion.
Do the task again from the beginning; stronger than a review.

Decision path: First ; if the order is muddy, ; if there is too much, . Only if the underlying concept fails might you . implies a broader reset.

Retrieve 1 · Choose the operation

Complete the four meeting updates with 見直す・整理し直す・練り直す・絞り込む, changing form as needed. Decide what the speaker is actually doing.

1 changes order; 2 reduces options; 3 reviews an existing structure; 4 revisits the concept itself. Other answers may work if the situation changes—explain your intended scope.

Retrieve 2 · Generic to natural

Your draft has good ideas, but too much information. Rephrase this blunt, generic line to keep the good parts and specify one operation:

The revision now has a scope: retain the direction, reduce content, review structure. presents it as a collaborative suggestion.

Retrieve 3 · 〜直す in context

Say these as one compact sentence each: “We wrote the copy, but it is too long; we’ll rewrite it.” “The team roles are unbalanced; we’ll reorganize them.”

The first repeats writing; the second repeats team formation. would mean review those things, without promising a complete rewrite or reorganization.

3 · Naturalness check · about 1 minute

Match the verb to the size of the change

The first may be appropriate for a failed proposal, but it sounds like a full reset. If the basic direction is sound, name the smaller revision. does not necessarily imply an error.

When the team still needs input, is a natural meeting move, not literally carrying an object home. It sets up who will think further before the next decision.

4 · Speaking retrieval · about 2 minutes

A proposal with too much information

Take 20 seconds for cue words, then speak for 60–90 seconds as a teammate. Use plus at least two of . Also try one soft suggestion.

  1. Say what works in the current website proposal.
  2. Explain why the purpose is hard to see.
  3. Say what to retain and which specific changes to make.
  4. Decide whether to settle it now or take it back to the team.
  5. Offer a concrete next step and deadline.

Ask a follow-up question or send your spoken version for feedback. Reading the model is not evidence of mastery; try again later with a different proposal.